New weekly column, “Faith Matters” coming to Franklin County News Online

Staff Report

Franklin County News-Online is pleased to announce a new weekly addition to our growing list of writers and columnists.

Pastors from the Sesser-Valier Ministerial Alliance will be contributing a column each week on a wide and diverse range of topics. The weekly endeavor — called “Faith Matters” – will run each Friday in FCN Online.

Owner/Publisher Jim Muir said he is excited about the new association with local pastors and believes the weekly column will provide commentary that will “inspire, motivate and add food for thought for our many readers.”

“While we were discussing the parameters of the weekly column the one item that was discussed the most was the content of the column,” said Muir. “I made it clear that I wanted to give the pastors a lot of freedom in their writing. I believe we will have columns that will range from what is happening at some local churches to points of view on national, state and local issues. I see this as being a great source of information for our readers, and more importantly I believe it will open a line of discussion on important issues.”

The Rev. Kirk Packer, president of the ministerial alliance and pastor of First Christian Church in Sesser, said he believes the weekly articles will be important in showing how faith is a part of our everyday life.

“One of the tragedies of our current culture is that many of us have bought the lie that our faith does not apply to the daily decisions of life.  This separation of faith and life has led us down a slope of darkness that will end in slavery,” said Packer.  “One of my hopes for this article is that through it we can show how faith impacts every facet of our lives and leads us to real freedom.  This truth flies in the face of the false notion that faith actually leads to oppression.  The history of the founding of our nation, affirms that faith applied to the core of all our decisions is actually the door to real freedom.”

Faith Matters will run each Friday in FCN Online and all the columns will be linked to Facebook.

 

Our Universities: Bureaucracy and Morality

Bureaucracies create and sustain a moral perspective.
“If you are going to sin, sin against God, not the bureaucracy. God will forgive you but the bureaucracy won’t.”

— Hyman Rickover–
___________________________________________________

By Walter V. Wendler

Effective bureaucracies — vision directed guidelines and processes — are flywheels reducing vibration in an organization by tempering irregularity and providing consistency and rhythm. They are exceedingly rare.  Typically, and unfortunately, bureaucracies do little of value to focus on first purpose.  Inevitably they become twisted first purpose and live outside the watch, like a wicked watchmaker.  Any human organization that aspires to purpose and excellence via regularity of process alone cannot do so.  It is lost.

Walter Wendler mug 2Max Weber, a German sociologist whose ideas flourished in the 1930’s and 40’s, identified key principles of good government: 1) formal structure, 2) management by rules, 3)  fixed division of labor, 4) equity based treatment of employees and customers, 5) success determined by technical qualifications, 6) all knotted together by a propensity to enlarge.  Number six, added by C. Northcott Parkinson as a criticism, became known as “Parkinson’s Law.”

Douglas J. Amy, a professor of politics at Mount Holyoke College, argues that bureaucracy is government and therefore it’s good in a stunningly simplistic story called “Government Is Good.”   He tries to break myths such as bureaucracies are wasteful, government should be a business, bureaucracies cause government growth, and bureaucracies provide poor service. Visit the Department of Motor Vehicles in New York or California to see how far out in left field Amy is.  Although intricately woven, Amy’s and Weber’s “bureaucracies-are-good” or create “good” are still nonsense, whether caring for the sick, educating the young, or selling nuts and bolts.

Robert Jackall’s “Moral Mazes: Bureaucracy and Managerial Work”, in the Harvard Business Review, 1983, suggests that managers create a morality in an organization by day-to-day actions — habit.  My friend used to have a sign in his office, “Make order and cleanliness a habit.”  Process becomes all and it’s hard to argue against fair processes.  But vital opportunity is leadership-driven through predictable behavior. If “Weber’s Web” takes over rules govern, not people. And this road to nowhere is paved with good intentions. This visionless path spawned by rationality and procedural perfection, guided by management processes rather than ideas and passion, is full of potholes.

The real work of any organization of two or more people, public or private, should be excellence through the attainment of a vision guided mission.  However, bureaucracies are sanitized from any guiding perspective working under the assumption that because different moralities exist in pluralistic organizations, it is preferred that the organization have no perspective at all, moral or otherwise.

Teamwork and thoughtful mission directed processes shouldn’t be confused with bureaucracy.  Teamwork is essential, bureaucracy is crippling.   But fair processes are vital:  Don’t choke this idea for its seemingly autocratic tendencies.  Kevin Williamson in National Review Online argued last week that damning autocracy exists in bureaucracies upheld by rules established by committees.  Worse yet, nobody, not even leadership, appears responsible…just good managers following democratically determined processes and rules.  That should be Mr. Weber’s first law, make everyone responsible for nothing.  Such organizations claim to embrace “Management Morality” as a means to equity and fairness.

Managerial plebiscites are disingenuous and rudderless.  Indeed, the best ideas frequently well-up from the ground, not dribbling down from on-high.  Bureaucracies bent on a rule-driven aversion to risk create listlessness.  Organizational morality hates intelligence apart from process.  The morality of the bureaucracy is not wedded to the functional goal of excellence but procedural machination elevated to a perverse art-form of jots and tittles.

Initiative is replaced by the caprice of mindless obedience. Willful compliance based on a commitment to cause beyond process is invaluable, but mindless conformity to anything is worthless and suffocating.  This, for many organizations, is the operational morality paralyzing human initiative, commitment to high purpose, and progress that provides for liberty and achievement.
Our universities are too frequently bedeviled by the seemingly benevolent belief that procedural rationality creates quality.  Sorry, it won’t.  Bureaucracy birthed moral perspective should be checked at the front door:  It devastates everything a university, or any human organization, should strive for.

Our Universities: Fifteen Dollars a Week

The loan industry has a dubious impact on higher education.  It advocates, unknowingly or deceitfully, that a college degree is always an excellent investment.   It helps shift focus to cost as a measure of everything, away from quality, value and utility. Students and parents should ask hard questions about fit and purpose.
“Just as buying speculative stocks makes sense for some investors but not others, so “investing” in a college education has a payoff for some–but for many others it is a mistake.”
— Richard Vedder —
____________________________________________________

By Walter V. Wendler

Washington, with the pomp of a major achievement, established caps on interest rates for subsidized student loans at 3.9%.  The rates, down from a dangled 6.9% levy are born of a desire to increase the number of graduates from programs ranging from one to 4 years.

Walter Wendler mug 2Lower borrowing costs potentially increase the population pursuing degrees. As low-cost/low-scrutiny mortgages led to increased housing costs, so will low-cost loans for education lead to increased costs for students. The housing bubble was puffed-up with a seemingly well-intended political penchant to generate “homeowners”.  The education bubble is inflated with the same gas: More “graduates” are good news.

An honest lender used to assess the appropriateness of any loan on the likelihood of a borrower’s ability to repay. There is little assessment when repayment is guaranteed by subsidies of any kind.  The Dust Bowl taught us that. More crop production is not always better in the short or long term.

A quality degree in a high-demand field is a good lending bet. Degrees where employment likelihood is low, or worse non-existent, are bad debt in the making.  Equating education and consumer investments may be a crass characterization.  But, it’s your money as either a borrower or taxpayer. And, crasser yet, ponder a graduate with $40,000 in debt with little or no current or projected employment potential.   If that graduate is living in your extra bedroom, made extra when the protégé went off to college, debt-free and chock-full of hope — that’s the crassest of all and it stinketh.

And make no mistake: this seemingly well intended stimulus to continue the unending flow of low-cost cash into universities will increase cost.  It’s simple economics:  from John Maynard Keynes or Milton Friedman; Adam Smith to Karl Marx.

And the impact the interest rate will have on students is real to be sure. A student who borrows $10,000 a year for college –$40,000 total — would have to repay $15,239 in interest over 10 years if pegged at 6.9%. The 3.9% rate drops the bill to $8,370.  The student would save $7,000 over the term of the loan. It’s real money, but that’s $15 a week. Basing a decision to pursue one career or another, at this university or that, or none at all, on $15 a week seems oversimplified: penny-wise, and pound foolish.  Cable news of every persuasion has been awash with sound bites about the power of percentage points and the salvation of the American dream.
George Miller of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce said, “This bill provides American college students immediate debt relief on upcoming student loans.”  Fifteen bucks a week for a college graduate? Debt relief?

Or maybe Congressman Miller was talking about the supposed consequences of $15 a week on the graduate whose earning power is increased by nearly $1 million over a lifetime according to some government projections. Hyperbole is everywhere.
Leaders and lenders should be evaluating universities. A “cash cow” degree that provides easy access and low utility through interest-rate-capped federally subsidized loans undermines the integrity of higher education from the inside out.
Honest assessments and clear expectations should be the order of the day for all elected officials, institutional boards, leaders, and faculty on the one hand; and students and families on the other.

Our universities should be straightforward regarding the potential for students to succeed and the worth of what they’ve succeeded at. Without truthfulness, the perceived value of higher education to our nation’s prosperity, and to personal fulfillment, will appear as, and become one more snout at the trough.
All for $15 a week.

Our Universities: Stewards — not Wards — of the State

State funding has its place but too much might create organizational laziness, leadership ineffectiveness, and unattainable expectations.  Unbridled dependence morphs into a form of gluttony.
“The more subsidized it is, the less free it is. What is known as `free education’ is the least free of all, for it is a state-owned institution; it is socialized education,  just like socialized medicine or the socialized post office  and cannot possibly be separated from political control.”
Frank Chodorov, “Why Free Schools Are Not Free,” 1948 _____________________________________________________
You may not like these few observations.  They may be misunderstood.

Walter Wendler mug 2All states are underfunding higher education compared to Cold War levels.  It won’t change. In addition, all states are underfunding every department from Agriculture to Workers Compensation…I looked for a state agency that started with “Z”, but “W” was the best I could do.

States have underfunded pensions, insurance systems, and other long-term benefit provisions.  Leaders expended funds from those coffers to help alleviate broken campaign promises in other areas: Robbing Peter to pay Paul.  Detroit may epitomize the phenomenon. It is not alone but the leading edge of a relentless curve.    Our eyes are bigger than our stomachs.  What else is new? It’s human nature from the beginning of recorded history.

Is higher education important?  Absolutely.  And so is Workers Compensation: just ask someone injured on the job.  Some beat the Workers Compensation system with false claims.  Some institutions beat the higher education system with false promises.
Many leaders fear underfunding of public higher education will lead to privatization of the enterprise. It’s too late.  That horse is out of the barn — in fact — it was never in the barn.  Public higher education, from its inception, has always been a marriage of public and private effort of individuals and institutions. And this coupling requires a unique view of leadership.

Universities are distinctive organizations in the matrix of entities that receive state support. By their nature the opportunity exists to use the primary function of the university to mine funds from other sources to augment state dollars.  For example, state dollars may be used to help build buildings, and those buildings provide classrooms, food service, residence halls, theaters, outreach, consulting, and stadiums that generate cash flow: a form of “fracking” for funding.

Heightened entrepreneurship, risk taking, courage, and vision are necessary. Not unlike Christ’s Parable of the Talents recorded in the 25th chapter of Saint Mathew’s Gospel; or John Milton’s sonnet, “On His Blindness” that also crystallizes the immutable responsibilities of stewardship.

Calculated risk and productive action are legitimate expectations.
State funding is down and costs — everything from plumbers to professors and milk to gasoline — are up.   Missions appropriate to available resources and institutional purpose are discoverable, but must be doggedly pursued and tailored to each other simultaneously.

To be sure, opportunity for investment differs by institution type.  In universities with extensive research activity, more entrepreneurism is possible.  Relationships with other funding agencies, private enterprise, and donors create partnerships and develop strength through diversity.  Bemoaning or retreating from scarcity provides neither solutions, nor progress.  It is a form of aggravated gluttony.

The best institutions ply their craft of promoting quality learning experiences and excellence in results with the resources that are provided. Guided by concerned faculty and institutional leadership greater freedom from interference of all kinds should accompany success in spite of declining state appropriations.

Limping leadership hardens inaction into a calcified culture and “woe-is-we” policy.  Institutional burdens have shifted to the statehouse, through dependence, and on to the White House, through low-cost loans, so universities could levy ever-increasing tuition and fees regardless of quality or benefits accrued to students.

The best institutions of every kind crave the concept of entrepreneurial spirit and the collective power of their faculty and students.  The state’s seed corn provides all institutions a chance for excellence through ingenuity and work.  The slothfulness of flagrant dependency kills quality.

Resourcefulness in response to a changed environment is not privatization, but savvy investment of scarce capital.
I told you — you might not like it.  But, that doesn’t change the reality our universities face.

Franklin County Farm Bureau News

 By J. Larry Miller

The weather this past week has been nothing short of wonderful with cool temperatures, heavy morning dew and soils damp with moisture. Crops are certainly looking very good with the possibility of corn yields being the best ever on some farms. Soybeans are looking very good also but it will be another 30 days before the outcome will be more certain. In the next couple of weeks we will be having our annual Corn Yield Tour which will give us a better handle on the yields in Franklin County.

Larry Miller, executive director Franklin County Farm Bureau

Larry Miller, executive director Franklin County Farm Bureau

All of these are only predictions at this point but as farmers we know it is not certain until it is in the bin.

On Tuesday, I attended a conference at Rend Lake College concerning hydraulic fracturing of oil wells. As most of you know the Illinois General Assembly passed legislation regulating this practice and the governor recently signed it into law which experts say is the most restrictive in the nation. This conference provided information about the law, the process of fracturing, the possible development of new oil exploration and economic boom that could result. There were 300 people that attend which indicates the interest that this project has generated.

This exploration has resulted in an economic boom in North Dakota, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Because of this new technology the U.S. has surpassed Russia in natural gas production and could well be the leader in oil production by 2017!

I have believed that this technology and the economic development that would follow is very real. With this being said, we have sold several plat books to oil groups that have been doing work at the courthouse for the last couple of years that were involved in the developments in other states.

There is a website www.energyindepth.org that provides a lot of good information about energy development in this country. Information such as our CO2 emissions are now the lowest since 1992. This was an excellent conference provided by our own Rend Lake College.

This July has marked the 20th anniversary of the Great Flood of 1993. There were catastrophic damages throughout much of the Upper Mississippi River Basin with 47 deaths, flood impacts over $15 billion, 72,000 homes were damages and one 200 mile section of the Mississippi River was left without a bridge crossing.

On Monday and Tuesday the Illinois Farm Bureau co-sponsored breakfast meetings to discuss Policy Development issues with local farmers. We discussed fracking, animal rights, farmer image and EPA regulations. Those in attendance not only left the meeting with a full stomach but became better informed on these issues.

Remember we are farmers working together. If we can help let us know.

Our Universities: Borders of the Mind

The beauty of American higher education is the coupling of thought and action:  Thinking people putting ideas to work make a university strong.  It’s the foundation of a free society to boot. But is it a disappearing reality?
“You see, idealism detached from action is just a dream. But idealism allied with pragmatism, with rolling up your sleeves and making the world bend a bit, is very exciting. It’s very real. It’s very strong.”

Bono
________________________________________________________________

By Walter V. Wendler

Hank Williams twanged Clarence Williams’ (no kin) ballad “My Bucket’s got A Hole in It” in 1949.   We have two holes in our higher education bucket in 2013 and they need plugging.

Walter Wendler mug 2Brain drain, not a flush but a slow leak, of students into Canada to places like McGill University in Montréal is gaining momentum. Speculation on causes of the migration proliferates. Six percent of the McGill’s students are U.S. citizens, and the number is growing. In an April 24th NBC report, Rehema Ellis and Jeff Black argue the primary reason for students departing the U.S. for Canada is cost.

McGill University is an excellent institution.  Comparison with U.S. institutions is difficult. This much is clear: costs are 25 cents on the dollar. The decisions are value judgments: Is a domestic degree worth four times what you would pay for its Canadian counterpart?  It’s a family decision.

The growing number of students in default on college loans, north of 15%, increasingly pinpoints cost as the central variable in the education equation.   The days of the idea that, “No matter what it costs it’s worth it.” are numbered.  Or evaporated, like a few of the 5,439 cubic miles of water in the Great Lakes, currently at their lowest level since 1918, according to a National Geographic study.
I know it’s a trickle, a few vapors.  And nobody sees it happen. But it does.

The number of students studying at Canadian institutions has increased by 50% over the last decade. The deep discounts compared to competitors south of the 49th parallel are magnetic:  Tens of thousands of dollars per year is real money to real people.
Our universities are built on the Western European model, reinvented and I believe perfected, 150 years ago, ignited by U.S. ingenuity driven by pragmatism at the pinnacle of the Industrial Revolution.

Our northern neighbors use a similar model.  Merit-based admission, test scores, class rank, grades, good faculty and facilities as well as reasonable approaches to “other-than-academic” amenities are the benchmarks.

Thoughtful American students are being siphoned off.

The open intellectual market should be the stone on which U.S. institutions whet their edge to meet the demands and needs of students, culture, and country, by helping people generate razor sharp insight and exceptional intellectual capability.
A second leaking of intellect is reported in a July 16, New York Times column. Richard Perez-Pena reveals the increasingly common occurrence of cyber attacks at U.S. universities. With greater frequency, intellectual property departs our borders over the Internet via stolen patents.  Citizens of nations less concerned about the value of intellectual property — knowledge and insight expressed in action — than we have historically been in America wantonly steal what’s not theirs.

This electronic larceny is directed towards the backbone of our republic — ideas — the cold steel of opportunity fired by opportunity.
These two leaks, one over the lakes, the other over the network, yield a costly impact on American economic vitality.
The trickle is starting.  A torrent may follow.

American pride’s seed is the “idea.”  We develop the patents for the VCR or the microwave and, if Japan, Taiwan, Korea, or Vietnam can produce the device at a lower cost, the U.S. still benefits… as long as our nation values the intellect and the property produced by it.  When we allow either to leave, we lose.

Our universities face significant challenges. We better get smart about controlling costs and quality. Likewise, the intellectual kettles in the kitchens of our nation should be carefully tended. The leaking bucket undermines American contributions to the democracy of ideas.

The nurture and protection of our insight and wisdom in every manifestation create a stronger nation and a better world.

Our Universities: All That Glitters Is Not Gold

Students and families should understand what is desired from an education.  Socially or politically prescribed solutions for personal aspirations don’t work.
“Truth, like gold, is to be obtained not by its growth, but by washing away from it all that is not gold.

— Leo Nikolaevich Tolstoy —
_________________________________________________________________

Oregon is breaking the funding mold for higher education. House Bill 3472 passed overwhelmingly and awaits the governor’s signature.   With no initial student investment, the plan proposes a maximum guaranteed loan payback of 3% of a borrower’s annual income for 24 years.  An uncollateralized no down payment loan with eventual payback fixed to earning capacity.

Walter Wendler mug 2The plan has been dubbed “Pay it Forward, Pay it Back.” It has a nice ring to it.

The impetus: Soaring costs and a 100% jump of interest rates from 3.4% to 6.8% on federally backed Stafford loans. It’s not surprising that students enrolled at Portland State University in a class entitled “Student Debt: Economics, Policy and Advocacy” helped give the legislative effort legs.

However, it should produce trepidation that will compound like interest on a loan shark’s balloon note.

Some aspects of HB 3472 are unclear. What is crystal clear:  The $24,616 in debt carried by the average student graduating from a university in Oregon grieves elected officials. I can promise you it grieves students and their families. I talk to them every day. It grieves leaders who ignore the devastating combination of increasing costs, diminished expectations and falling value of college degrees.  Intelligent action is required…grief fixes nothing.

Increasing costs are marked by runaway tuition and fees. Diminished expectations are evidenced in grade inflation, admission granted to unprepared students, and a proliferation of degrees with neither workforce benefit nor preparation for graduate school. On some days it seems the enterprise is falling apart, and proposals like HB 3472 are seductive in the educational leadership vacuum that chokes change by doggedly holding on to the campus status quo: more students, more money.

Universities offer an ever growing number of junk degrees. Tuition dollars are wrung out of students for study of little intrinsic or extrinsic value. With little emotional investment and no financial obligation, student commitment to study is too frequently in the tank.

Institutional and elected leadership pander for support fueled by a twisted view that success in life is tied to a college degree; the Oregon legislation does nothing to retool the calculus of higher education.

I don’t believe every degree must produce an immediate job. Every degree should provide opportunities for continued intellectual and economic growth to its holder. Intellectual and economic growth is determined on a one-at-a-time basis by a student. State run equations don’t work.   This commoditization of a university education equates an education to a cell phone, iPod, or food: it’s misguided and undermines the purpose of a university, community college, and trade school, all.

HB 3472 as championed by the 7000 member Oregon Working Families Party is riddled with potholes.
First, the road is indeed paved with good intentions. Of course, nearly $25,000 in debt for a degree with low value of any kind is wrong and impossible to defend before thoughtful families. Making more of these kinds of degrees available to more people on more borrowed money is even more egregious, no matter the payback plan.

Second, a degree guarantees little. Students and families need to be honestly apprised of the power of a specific degree, at a specific time. Performance is neither granted nor guaranteed by a degree. Value is not produced by the state, but by capable individuals. House Bill 3472 reinforces the idea that the degree is a trinket.

Third, it worked in Australia.  Really?  The jury is still out down under.   Indeed debt is lower, but has the value of the degree increased?  Is the human condition or economy better or stronger?  These are pivotal unanswered questions.

Fourth, value in anything earned decreases when attainment is guaranteed or easy.  A university education is a private betterment.  Public benefit comes when the knowledge and insight gained are levied by an individual.

Unwary prospectors looking for real gold are confused by Pyrite.  Students and families are similarly fooled by specious claims at what lies at the end of the rainbow, and too often it’s not a pot o’ gold, but a bag o’ debt, regardless of how it is paid off.

Franklin County Farm Bureau News

By J. Larry Miller

July 3, 2013

What a difference a year makes. Last year the first week of July gave us temperatures in the 100’s and this same time in 2013 we have yet to make it to the mid-70’s and the first 2 days of July were rainy with farmers wishing that it would stop at least for a few days.

Larry Miller, executive director Franklin County Farm Bureau

Larry Miller, executive director Franklin County Farm Bureau

All of this is making early corn look as good as I have ever seen. There is some April planted corn that is tasseling and pollination is very near. Wheat harvest is not complete and leaving farmers to wonder what condition it will be when harvest resumes.

Weeds are the main problem with resistance to herbicides making control almost impossible. Crop specialists are working on various formulations to try and control mares tail and water hemp. Ground conditions have been to wet for spraying this week which adds to the problem as weeds become more mature.

All of the rain has caused corn prices to fall into the $4 per bushel range and no doubt will get to $3 by harvest unless some problem arises.

I want to remind everyone that we are having our annual Farm Bureau/Country Financial Picnic on July 16th at 5 PM at the Franklin County 4-H Fairgrounds south of Rend Lake College. As a member all you have to do is come!

Last week our annual dues notices were sent out and we appreciate your support to Franklin County Farm Bureau.

Real Estate tax bills are out and landowners in Eastern, Ewing and Northern Townships saw lower bills because of the work of our members and our policy against backdoor referendums as was the case with the expansion of the Benton Library District. Your support of Farm Bureau by being a member helps us to work for you.

Not many people predicted the farm bill would be defeated, so it’s anyone’s guess what will happen when Congress returns next Monday July, 8 following the July 4 holiday recess.   Over the past couple of days, we’ve been hearing that House leadership is strongly considering a proposal to split the commodity title, crop insurance, conservation and other “farm” programs from the nutrition title.   Illinois Farm Bureau opposes this effort.   Electoral math and fear of making crop insurance the biggest target (roughly $9 bil/yr) in a “stand alone” ($20 bil./yr.) farm bill represent the biggest reasons for opposing the idea.   Also, it appears that passing a farm bill – minus the $80 bil./yr. nutrition title – is a non-starter with Senate agriculture committee chairman Debbie Stabenow.

Illinois Farm Bureau has joined AFBF, crop insurance groups, and others in a coalition letter to Speaker Boehner today that attempts to discourage the idea of splitting the farm bill.

The idea of redefining what constitutes a farm bill for the first time in decades seems to be motivated more to save political face than to get a bill done.   Splitting the farm bill into multiple components plays into the strategy of groups like Heritage Action, Club for Growth, and Americans for Prosperity, who would rather see no commodity program, no crop insurance program, and no nutrition assistance.   Their “divide and conquer” strategy to “reform” farm programs is well known.

Another idea being floated by Rep. Cheri Bustos, Rep. Bill Enyart and several of their Democratic ag committee colleagues would have the House take up the Senate farm bill, if the House is unable to move its own version.    While there might be a political point to be made, that idea isn’t likely

Remember we are farmers working together. If we can help let us know.

Our Universities: A Cacophony of Concerns

Increasing college costs and decreasing employment opportunity have produced an avalanche of studies regarding the value of college degrees.  Sometimes more information is not better. A “back to basics” understanding would be valuable to all.

“Nowadays people know the price of everything and the value of nothing.”
Oscar Wilde
_____________________________________

By Walter V. Wendler

Legitimate concerns about ever-increasing costs of college and a seemingly ever-decreasing availability of good paying jobs for the holders of degrees have generated studies that make a student’s and parent’s head spin.

Walter Wendler mug 2Recently, EducationSector, a think-tank that ponders education policy, published an investigation by Andrew Gillen, “In Debt and in the Dark: It’s Time for Better Information on Student Loan Defaults.” The findings were reported in USA Today under the headline, “College Default Rates Higher Than Graduation Rates.”

The claim in the Gillen study, reiterated by USA Today, asserts that more students are defaulting on education loans than graduating.  No secret to those who work with learners daily. The strongest students finish their degrees more closely to the traditional four-year benchmark, typically work diligently in part-time jobs, double-time in the summer, to avoid borrowing too much money.  They enter the workforce or graduate school closer to flush and ready to move forward.

When tagging someone “a good student” this, in part, is what is meant.

Gillen includes public two-year institutions along with national research universities. I am not convinced that these institutional types were accounted for fully. For example if a two-year institution has a 6% graduation rate it’s possible that 80% of the students who enroll never intend to complete a degree program, but take job-related courses to increase skills, or square dancing, both valuable pursuits, neither reflective of the failure of post-secondary educational institutions.

Don’t get me wrong…I tell students and families every chance I get, “Don’t borrow…find lower cost alternatives.”
However, not all students are good students and statistics, bantered between one pundit and another, make little distinction between students regarding motivation, interest and determination.

Another freshly minted study by PayScale.com analyzed 1,511 schools to assess return on investment (ROI) for a college education against the predicted 30 year earning capacity for graduates in an effort to rate “value.”  Financial aid was factored in. Looking through the list and trying to understand the self-reported data is mind-boggling.  Unfortunately, the effort produces little more than fear, trepidation and misinformation about value.

The usual “good universities” occupy the top spots: generally selective/expensive schools that lead to good jobs for competitive, well-prepared, motivated students.  Prestige is earned, never given…to paraphrase a potent line from the U.S. Marines.  The basement of the list includes for-profit, public and private institutions that accept any student with resources.  Nothing else seems to matter and the potential for prestige is mindlessly squandered.

A scant two dozen of the 1,511 schools are shown to have a negative ROI.  However, that does not make the rest a guaranteed good investment.  Shockingly, the difference between the best ROI and no ROI at all is less than 15%.  Dedicated teachers and motivated students bedevil measurement and exist in some measure in any institution.

Noise and disarray are the results of many studies of the purported value of higher education.

Honest, forthright, university leadership must present clear information to students. Spinning and public relations are, respectively, political and retail machinations. Universities are neither.

Resisting unrealistic hope regarding the benefits of any degree requires stainless steel backbone in leaders, not acquiescence. Remember, earned, never given. Motivated students and faculty reduce the debt burden and increase effectiveness and opportunity.

Nothing else.

This is not elitism as is too frequently claimed, but legitimate, sensible realism that calibrates attitude, backbone and capability, the ABCs of educational success.

In the next decade of the 21st century our best universities and community colleges will be heralded for honesty, eclipsing the touchstones of access and excellence.  University leadership must step up and transparently lay out the odds, tell ‘em the truth, as candidate Truman did in Harrisburg, Illinois in 1948.

The cat is out of the bag and the cacophony may be the overture of a symphony memorializing snake oil and lost trust.

Our Universities – Free Thinking

This column was originally published October 28, 2010.  It’s easy to forget the purpose of universities and the essential — if at times testy — interplay of free thought in a free society.  In an age that increasingly gives personal responsibility to the state, it’s easy to lose sight of the social value of deep free-will.  Martin Luther postulated a relationship that is the seed of a free society.  In 2010 some of my reflections regarding Luther were challenged. So be it.
— Walter V. Wendler
____________________________________________________________________________________

By Walter V. Wendler

Halloween marks a number of occasions but none more important than the nailing of Luther’s 95 Theses on the Castle Church door at Wittenberg — the birth of a reformation that transformed the modern world on October 31, 1517.

Walter Wendler mug 2This act changed things: not just the association of Christendom to the church; not just the relationship of Christendom to its namesake, Jesus Christ; not just the bond of a man to an organization; not just the suggestion that individuals are masters of their own fate; not just the impact of the printing press and the translation of the bible into German to make it accessible to all rather than just the few conversant in Latin; not just the concept that money could buy anything from happiness to heaven; not just the notion that a single man with a powerful idea could take on the largest multinational corporation in the world and start a revolution, a reformation; and certainly, not just the belief that concepts are important, even more so than the force of tradition and dogma, but rather that people with passion need to stand and risk.

“Here I stand.  I cannot do otherwise”, he said.  Just a man standing for what he thought right.

The Church was rocked, and the waves created extended well beyond its walls.  The power of a thinking person changed the course of humanity.  Other potent examples we know from world history.

I hope.
Here are ten individuals who had dramatic impact:  Albert Einstein, Johannes Gutenberg, Jesus Christ, Muhammad, Cai Lun (said to have invented paper, without which poor Gutenberg would have been hopeless), St. Paul, Marie Curie, Confucius, Buddha, and Isaac Newton.  Any historian worth his salt would affirm their inarguable influence.

Life as a lightning rod took its toll on Luther.  Obsessions developed, manifested later in his life by anti-Semitism that bordered on hate and madness.  His view, before the paranoia-poisoned madness set in, was that each person should discover his own way in the world.  That the need for the insertion of any man between a person and the Creator was not only unnecessary and limited, but antithetical to Holy Writ and the exercise of free will. We must stand or not on our own actions and decisions, neither bought nor begged.  Rugged individualists were needed, not beholden to a social or ecclesiastical organization contaminated by greed, avarice, or the collection of power. Even associations with the best intentions should not compel membership or ideas against individual free will.

Luther was a powerful free thinker who, by example, encouraged others to do likewise -to think freely – to make their own way guided by their own understanding of their place in the world, not by infringement of any kind.

This powerful thinking has little to do with candy corn and jack-o-lanterns, but much to do with the purpose of the university.  Luther’s boldness when he nailed his Theses to the church door that day in Wittenberg changed the western concept of social order.
His idea — squeezed out of his faith and insight — to create an appropriate sense of self- determination was more basic than had been previously known.

This is without qualification the work of the university – allowing lives to be defined by aspiration and passion rather than acquiescence and passivity.

At a university, the power of free thought, and engaging it through scholarship and learning, faith and experience, is so central that I can say with confidence that institutions neglecting it do not fulfill their mission to their students.
I wish he had nailed his 95 Theses to the door on July 4, rather than October 31.

Benton, West Frankfort, Illinois News | Franklin County News